Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/4804
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUzilday, Barış-
dc.contributor.authorTürkan, İsmail-
dc.contributor.authorSekmen, Aşkım Hediye-
dc.contributor.authorÖzgür, Rengin-
dc.contributor.authorKarakaya, Hüseyin Çağlar-
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-07T12:31:55Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-07T12:31:55Z-
dc.date.issued2012-01-
dc.identifier.citationUzilday, B., Türkan, İ., Sekmen, A. H., Özgür, R., and Karakaya, H. Ç. (2012). Comparison of ROS formation and antioxidant enzymes in Cleome gynandra (C 4) and Cleome spinosa (C 3) under drought stress. Plant Science, 182(1), 59-70. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.015en_US
dc.identifier.issn0168-9452-
dc.identifier.issn1873-2259-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.015-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11147/4804-
dc.description.abstractDifferences between antioxidant responses to drought in C 3 and C 4 plants are rather scanty. Even, we are not aware of any research on comparative ROS formation and antioxidant enzymes in C 3 and C 4 species differing in carboxylation pathway of same genus which would be useful to prevent other differences in plant metabolism. With this aim, relative shoot growth rate, relative water content and osmotic potential, hydrogen peroxide (H 2O 2) content and NADPH oxidase (NOX) activity, antioxidant defence system (superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POX), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione reductase (GR) enzymes and their isoenzymes), CAT1 mRNA level, and lipid peroxidation in seedlings of Cleome spinosa (C 3) and Cleome gynandra (C 4) species of Cleome genus exposed to drought stress for 5 and 10 day (d) were comparatively investigated. Constitutive levels of antioxidant enzymes (except SOD) were consistently higher in C. spinosa than in C. gynandra under control conditions. CAT1 gene expression in C. spinosa was correlated with CAT activity but CAT1 gene expression in C. gynandra at 10 d did not show this correlation. Drought stress caused an increase in POX, CAT, APX and GR in both species. However, SOD activity was slightly decreased in C. gynandra while it was remained unchanged or increased on 5 and 10 d of stress in C. spinosa, respectively. Parallel to results of malon dialdehyde (MDA), H 2O 2 content was also remarkably increased in C. spinosa as compared to C. gynandra under drought stress. These results suggest that in C. spinosa, antioxidant defence system was insufficient to suppress the increasing ROS production under stress condition. On the other hand, in C. gynandra, although its induction was lower as compared to C. spinosa, antioxidant system was able to cope with ROS formation under drought stress. © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofPlant Scienceen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAntioxidant enzymesen_US
dc.subjectCleome gynandraen_US
dc.subjectCleome spinosaen_US
dc.subjectDrought analysisen_US
dc.titleComparison of ROS formation and antioxidant enzymes in Cleome gynandra (C 4) and Cleome spinosa (C 3) under drought stressen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.authoridTR24898en_US
dc.institutionauthorKarakaya, Hüseyin Çağlar-
dc.departmentİzmir Institute of Technology. Molecular Biology and Geneticsen_US
dc.identifier.volume182en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage59en_US
dc.identifier.endpage70en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000298723200008en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-82155179257en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.015-
dc.identifier.pmid22118616en_US
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.015en_US
dc.coverage.doi10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.015en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.identifier.wosqualityttpTop10%en_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeArticle-
crisitem.author.dept04.03. Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics-
Appears in Collections:Molecular Biology and Genetics / Moleküler Biyoloji ve Genetik
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
4804.pdfMakale1.5 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

143
checked on Apr 5, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

115
checked on Mar 27, 2024

Page view(s)

470
checked on Apr 15, 2024

Download(s)

704
checked on Apr 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.