Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11147/4804
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Uzilday, Barış | - |
dc.contributor.author | Türkan, İsmail | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sekmen, Aşkım Hediye | - |
dc.contributor.author | Özgür, Rengin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Karakaya, Hüseyin Çağlar | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-07T12:31:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-07T12:31:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Uzilday, B., Türkan, İ., Sekmen, A. H., Özgür, R., and Karakaya, H. Ç. (2012). Comparison of ROS formation and antioxidant enzymes in Cleome gynandra (C 4) and Cleome spinosa (C 3) under drought stress. Plant Science, 182(1), 59-70. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.015 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0168-9452 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-2259 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.015 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11147/4804 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Differences between antioxidant responses to drought in C 3 and C 4 plants are rather scanty. Even, we are not aware of any research on comparative ROS formation and antioxidant enzymes in C 3 and C 4 species differing in carboxylation pathway of same genus which would be useful to prevent other differences in plant metabolism. With this aim, relative shoot growth rate, relative water content and osmotic potential, hydrogen peroxide (H 2O 2) content and NADPH oxidase (NOX) activity, antioxidant defence system (superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POX), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione reductase (GR) enzymes and their isoenzymes), CAT1 mRNA level, and lipid peroxidation in seedlings of Cleome spinosa (C 3) and Cleome gynandra (C 4) species of Cleome genus exposed to drought stress for 5 and 10 day (d) were comparatively investigated. Constitutive levels of antioxidant enzymes (except SOD) were consistently higher in C. spinosa than in C. gynandra under control conditions. CAT1 gene expression in C. spinosa was correlated with CAT activity but CAT1 gene expression in C. gynandra at 10 d did not show this correlation. Drought stress caused an increase in POX, CAT, APX and GR in both species. However, SOD activity was slightly decreased in C. gynandra while it was remained unchanged or increased on 5 and 10 d of stress in C. spinosa, respectively. Parallel to results of malon dialdehyde (MDA), H 2O 2 content was also remarkably increased in C. spinosa as compared to C. gynandra under drought stress. These results suggest that in C. spinosa, antioxidant defence system was insufficient to suppress the increasing ROS production under stress condition. On the other hand, in C. gynandra, although its induction was lower as compared to C. spinosa, antioxidant system was able to cope with ROS formation under drought stress. © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd. | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Plant Science | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Antioxidant enzymes | en_US |
dc.subject | Cleome gynandra | en_US |
dc.subject | Cleome spinosa | en_US |
dc.subject | Drought analysis | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of ROS formation and antioxidant enzymes in Cleome gynandra (C 4) and Cleome spinosa (C 3) under drought stress | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.authorid | TR24898 | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Karakaya, Hüseyin Çağlar | - |
dc.department | İzmir Institute of Technology. Molecular Biology and Genetics | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 182 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 59 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 70 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000298723200008 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-82155179257 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.015 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22118616 | en_US |
dc.relation.doi | 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.015 | en_US |
dc.coverage.doi | 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.015 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | - |
dc.identifier.wosqualityttp | Top10% | en_US |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 04.03. Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics | - |
Appears in Collections: | Molecular Biology and Genetics / Moleküler Biyoloji ve Genetik PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
151
checked on Nov 15, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
124
checked on Oct 26, 2024
Page view(s)
604
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Download(s)
954
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.