Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/10486
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAydoğan, Tumaytr
dc.contributor.authorSezgin, Efetr
dc.contributor.authorİlvan, Şennurtr
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Osman Cemtr
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Nesrintr
dc.contributor.authorGolshan, Mehratr
dc.contributor.authorAydoğan, Fatihtr
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-24T18:44:54Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-24T18:44:54Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn1526-8209-
dc.identifier.issn1938-0666-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2019.09.002-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/10486-
dc.description.abstractWe sought to compare radio-guided localization and magnetic tracer localization techniques by using a phantom model for excision of nonpalpable breast lesions. There was no difference between the groups in the duration of operative excision, specimen weight, or specimen volume. Magnetic occult lesion localization can be performed in clinics without the need for a nuclear medicine team and radiation safety procedures. Background: Localization of nonpalpable breast cancers can be achieved with several techniques. We sought to compare radio-guided localization (ROLL) and magnetic tracer localization (MOLL) techniques by using a phantom model we previously developed, which can provide an accurate simulation for excision of nonpalpable breast lesions. Materials and Methods: We designed 20 phantom models (10 MOLL, 10 ROLL group) for localization. A handheld gamma probe for the ROLL group and a manual magnetometer (SentiMag) for the MOLL group were used to test the ability of the modality to detect olives in turkey breasts. The excision time for each procedure, specimen size, and weight of the specimens removed from the turkey breasts were recorded. Results: Both techniques resulted in 100% retrieval of the lesions. There was no difference between the groups in the duration of operative excision, specimen weight, or specimen volume. Conclusion: This experimental trial found similar success rates for ROLL and MOLL in localization of occult lesions using the turkey breast phantom model. MOLL can be performed in clinics without the need for a nuclear medicine team and radiation safety procedures. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Breast Canceren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBreast surgeryen_US
dc.subjectImage-guided localizationen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic tracer localizationen_US
dc.subjectOccult breast lesionsen_US
dc.subjectRadio-guided localizationen_US
dc.titleComparison of Radio-guided Occult Lesion Localization (ROLL) and Magnetic Occult Lesion Localization (MOLL) for non-palpable lesions: A phantom model studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.institutionauthorSezgin, Efetr
dc.departmentİzmir Institute of Technology. Food Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE9en_US
dc.identifier.endpageE13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000514833800002en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85074687525en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıtr
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clbc.2019.09.002-
dc.identifier.pmid31699672en_US
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.clbc.2019.09.002en_US
dc.coverage.doi10.1016/j.clbc.2019.09.002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.dept03.08. Department of Food Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Food Engineering / Gıda Mühendisliği
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S152682091930672X-main.pdf1.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Dec 6, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on Dec 7, 2024

Page view(s)

1,468
checked on Dec 2, 2024

Download(s)

78
checked on Dec 2, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.