Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/7047
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYürüm, Ozan Raşit-
dc.contributor.authorDemirörs, Onur-
dc.contributor.authorRabhi, Fethi-
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-17T13:00:03Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-17T13:00:03Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationYürüm, O. R., Demirörs, O., and Rabhi, F. (2018). A comprehensive evaluation of agile maturity self-assessment surveys. In I. Stamelos, R. V. O'Connor, T. Rout, and A. Dorling (Eds.), Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. SPICE 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, (pp. 300-315). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00623-5_21en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-030-00622-8-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00623-5_21-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11147/7047-
dc.description18th International Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, SPICE 2018; Tessaloniki; Greece; 9 October 2018 through 10 October 2018en_US
dc.description.abstractAgile methodologies are adapted by growing number of software organizations. Agile maturity (also called agility) assessment is a way to ascertain the degree of this adoption and determine a course of action to improve agile maturity. There are a number of agile maturity assessment surveys in order to assess team or organization agility and many of them require no guidance. However, the usability of these surveys are not widely studied. The purpose of this study is to determine available agile maturity self-assessment surveys and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses for agile maturity assessment. An extensive case study is conducted to measure the sufficiency of 22 available agile maturity self-assessment surveys according to the seven expected features: comprehensiveness, fitness for purpose, discriminativeness, objectivity, conciseness, generalizability, and suitability for multiple assessment. Our case study results show that they do not satisfy all of the expected features fully but are helpful in some degree based on the purpose of usage.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTurkish Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK), Project 113E528en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagen_US
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/TUBITAK/EEEAG/113E528en_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, SPICE 2018en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAgility assessmenten_US
dc.subjectAgility surveysen_US
dc.subjectSelf assessmenten_US
dc.subjectAgile methodologiesen_US
dc.titleA comprehensive evaluation of agile maturity self-assessment surveysen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dc.authoridTR167231en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-6601-3937-
dc.institutionauthorDemirörs, Onur-
dc.departmentİzmir Institute of Technology. Computer Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.volume918en_US
dc.identifier.startpage300en_US
dc.identifier.endpage315en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85054840930en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-00623-5_21-
dc.relation.doi10.1007/978-3-030-00623-5_21en_US
dc.coverage.doi10.1007/978-3-030-00623-5_21en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeConference Object-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept03.04. Department of Computer Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Computer Engineering / Bilgisayar Mühendisliği
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
7047.pdfConference Paper332.51 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Jul 12, 2024

Page view(s)

324
checked on Jul 15, 2024

Download(s)

1,212
checked on Jul 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.