Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/5043
Title: Reading CS classics
Authors: Tekir, Selma
Keywords: Computer programming
Computing industry
Dijkstra
Formal proofs
Good practices
Numbering systems
Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Source: Tekir, S. (2012). Reading CS classics. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 32-34. doi:10.1145/2133806.2133818
Abstract: Knowledge of the theories of computer science (CS) helps in understanding the limitations of the field by providing users with new perspectives and insights. It can be a good practice for CS professionals to compile their own list of classics that highlights some key scientific concepts of the field. 'An Axiomatic Basis for Computer Programming,' by C.A.R. Hoare is a CS classic, which tells about the computing industry of the 1960s and 1970s in Britain. Hoare provides a foundation for the formal proofs of programs by an algebraic assertions-based approach. 'Computing Machinery and Intelligence,' by A.M. Turing tells about the computer numbering systems that provide unique representation to every programming construct. Dijkstra' s realization of the high intellectual challenge of programming and his encouragement made him one of the greatest minds of computer programming. Donald Knuth is extraordinary with his perspective on computer programming.
URI: http://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133818
http://hdl.handle.net/11147/5043
ISSN: 0001-0782
Appears in Collections:Computer Engineering / Bilgisayar Mühendisliği
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
5043.pdfMakale1.76 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

754
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Download(s)

704
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.