Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11147/1995
Title: | Determination of octane number of gasoline using near infrared spectroscopy and genetic multivariate calibration methods | Authors: | Özdemir, Durmuş | Keywords: | Antiknock rating Calibration Diffusion Error analysis Genetic algorithms Infrared spectroscopy Least squares approximations |
Publisher: | Taylor and Francis Ltd. | Source: | Özdemir, D. (2005). Determination of octane number of gasoline using near infrared spectroscopy and genetic multivariate calibration methods. Petroleum Science and Technology, 23(9-10). 1139-1152. doi:10.1081/LFT-200035547 | Abstract: | The feasibility of rating the octane number of gasoline using near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy and three different genetic algorithm-based multivariate calibration methods was demonstrated. The three genetic multivariate calibration methods are genetic regression (GR), genetic classical least squares (GCLS), and genetic inverse least squares (GILS). The sample data set was obtained from the ftp address (ftp://ftp.clarkson.edu/pub/hopkepk/Chemdata/) with the permission of Professor. J. H. Kalivas. This data set contains the NIR spectra of 60 gasoline samples collected using diffuse reflectance as log (I / R) with known octane numbers and covers the range from 900 to 1700 nm in 2 nm intervals. Of these 60 spectra, 20 were used as the calibration set, 20 were used as the prediction set, and 20 were reserved for the validation purposes. Several calibration models were built with the three genetic algorithm-based methods, and the results were compared with the partial least squares (PLS) prediction errors reported in the literature. Overall, the standard error of calibration (SEC), standard error of prediction (SEP), and standard error of validation (SEV) values were in the range of 0.15-0.32 (in the units of motor octane number) for the GR and GILS, which are comparable with the literature. However, GCLS produced relatively large results (0.36 for SEC, 0.39 for SEP and 0.52 for SEV) when compared with the other two methods. | URI: | http://doi.org/10.1081/LFT-200035547 http://hdl.handle.net/11147/1995 |
ISSN: | 1091-6466 1532-2459 1091-6466 |
Appears in Collections: | Chemistry / Kimya Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
22
checked on Nov 15, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
21
checked on Nov 9, 2024
Page view(s)
1,444
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Download(s)
1,134
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.