Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/13421
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorÜnlü, Hüseyin-
dc.contributor.authorHacaloğlu, Tuna-
dc.contributor.authorBüber, Fatma-
dc.contributor.authorBerrak, Kıvılcım-
dc.contributor.authorLeblebici, Onur-
dc.contributor.authorDemirörs, Onur-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-19T12:41:43Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-19T12:41:43Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.isbn9781665461528-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA56994.2022.00045-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/13421-
dc.description48th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, SEAA 2022 -- 31 August 2022 through 2 September 2022en_US
dc.description.abstractFunctional size measurement (FSM) methods, by being systematic and repeatable, are beneficial in the early phases of the software life cycle for core project management activities such as effort, cost, and schedule estimation. However, in agile projects, requirements are kept minimal in the early phases and are detailed over time as the project progresses. This situation makes it challenging to identify measurement components of FSM methods from requirements in the early phases, hence complicates applying FSM in agile projects. In addition, the existing FSM methods are not fully compatible with today's architectural styles, which are evolving into event-driven decentralized structures. In this study, we present the results of a case study to compare the effectiveness of different size measures: functional -COSMIC Function Points (CFP)-, event-based – Event Points-, and code length-based - Line of Code (LOC)- on projects that were developed with agile methods and utilized a microservice-based architecture. For this purpose, we measured the size of the project and created effort estimation models based on three methods. It is found that the event-based method estimated effort with better accuracy than the CFP and LOC-based methods. © 2022 IEEE.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipACKNOWLEDGMENT We would like to thank the support of The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) ARDEB 1001 [Project number: 121E389] program.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineersen_US
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings - 48th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, SEAA 2022en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAgile software developmenten_US
dc.subjectCOSMICen_US
dc.subjectEfforten_US
dc.subjectEvent-based measurementen_US
dc.subjectSoftware designen_US
dc.titleUtilization of three software size measures for effort estimation in Agile World: A case studyen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dc.institutionauthorÜnlü, Hüseyin-
dc.institutionauthorÜnlü, Hüseyin-
dc.institutionauthorBüber, Fatma-
dc.institutionauthorBerrak, Kıvılcık-
dc.institutionauthorDemirörs, Onur-
dc.departmentİzmir Institute of Technology. Computer Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.startpage239en_US
dc.identifier.endpage246en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85147650110en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/SEAA56994.2022.00045-
dc.authorscopusid57521977500-
dc.authorscopusid56422190200-
dc.authorscopusid58096170300-
dc.authorscopusid58095569100-
dc.authorscopusid57220751565-
dc.authorscopusid55949165100-
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeConference Object-
crisitem.author.dept03.04. Department of Computer Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Computer Engineering / Bilgisayar Mühendisliği
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Nov 15, 2024

Page view(s)

158
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.