Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/12495
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKobya, Mehmeten_US
dc.contributor.authorDolaz, Mustafaen_US
dc.contributor.authorÖzaydın Şenol, Burcuen_US
dc.contributor.authorGören, Ayşegül Yağmuren_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-30T07:24:10Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-30T07:24:10Z-
dc.date.issued2022-09-
dc.identifier.issn2405-8440-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10489-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/12495-
dc.description.abstractElectrocoagulation (EC) is a significantly efficient method for As removal from waters and received considerable attention recently. In this study, the natural groundwater (GW) samples containing As concentrations of GW-1: 538.8 μg L−1, GW-2: 1132.1 μg L−1, and GW-3: 52, 000 μg L−1 were obtained from different provinces and treated by EC process using different iron anodes (plate, ball, and scrap). To achieve drinking water As standard (10 μg L−1), the operational time, applied current, and As removal optimization for all anode types were studied. At applied current of 0.025 A, the As removal efficiency, EC time, and operating cost were >99.9%, 180 min and 0.406 $ m−3 for ball anodes, >99.9%, 100 min and 0.0813 $ m−3 for plate anodes, >99.9%, 80 min and 0.0815 $ m−3 for scrap anodes for GW-3, respectively. It was observed that as the As concentration in the GW increased, the EC time and operating cost increased. Overall, it was concluded that Fe scrap anodes are more advantageous than other types of anodes in terms of operating cost in EC reactor for As removal.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofHeliyonen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectArsenic removalen_US
dc.subjectBall anodeen_US
dc.subjectElectrocoagulationen_US
dc.subjectGroundwateren_US
dc.subjectScrap anodeen_US
dc.titleRemoval of arsenic in groundwater from western Anatolia, Turkey using an electrocoagulation reactor with different types of iron anodesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-1114-6059en_US
dc.institutionauthorGören, Ayşegül Yağmuren_US
dc.departmentİzmir Institute of Technology. Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000860591400018en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85137642218en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10489-
dc.relation.issn2405-8440en_US
dc.description.volume8en_US
dc.description.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept03.07. Department of Environmental Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Environmental Engineering / Çevre Mühendisliği
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S2405844022017777-main.pdfArticle (Makale)1.5 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Nov 22, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Nov 9, 2024

Page view(s)

274
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Download(s)

98
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.