Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11147/11427
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Taneri, Batuhan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Doğan, Fehmi | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-06T09:48:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-06T09:48:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1871-1871 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1878-0423 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100781 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11147/11427 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The study explores students? perceptions of experiential learning, design and design process, and design education, and whether these perceptions vary according to school year students are in based on qualitative and quantitative data collected from two architectural schools. We inquire into how creativity and design could be learned through repeated design tasks without structured instructions about the creative design process. The explorative study employs surveys and semistructured focus group interviews. The results indicate problem-solving view of design is the most common characterization, students think design is not a straightforward problem solving and is most related to art and creativity. Finally, students report school has a limited impact on how they learn designing. We conclude experiential learning in the studio create shortcomings if not accompanied with a critical and reflective stance and that undertaking design tasks one after the other without explicit reflection on these tasks is an inefficient strategy in learning about the creative design process. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Thinking Skills and Creativity | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Creativity | en_US |
dc.subject | Design education | en_US |
dc.subject | Design learning | en_US |
dc.subject | Design studio | en_US |
dc.subject | Design pedagogy | en_US |
dc.title | How to learn to be creative in design: Architecture students' perceptions of design, design process, design learning, and their transformations throughout their education | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0003-4754-1907 | - |
dc.department | İzmir Institute of Technology. Architecture | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 39 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000640935300031 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85100184173 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100781 | - |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 01. Izmir Institute of Technology | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 02.02. Department of Architecture | - |
Appears in Collections: | Architecture / Mimarlık Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S1871187120302558-main.pdf | 830.82 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
20
checked on Nov 15, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
18
checked on Nov 9, 2024
Page view(s)
638
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Download(s)
84
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.