Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/7593
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTuyan, Murat-
dc.contributor.authorAhari, Reza Saleh-
dc.contributor.authorErdem, Tahir Kemal-
dc.contributor.authorAndiç Çakır, Özge-
dc.contributor.authorRamyar, Kambiz-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-16T11:54:12Z
dc.date.available2020-01-16T11:54:12Z
dc.date.issued2018-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationTuyan, M., Ahari, R. S., Erdem, T. K., Andiç Çakır, Ö., and Ramyar, K. (2018). Influence of thixotropy determined by different test methods on formwork pressure of self-consolidating concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 173, 189-200. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.046en_US
dc.identifier.issn0950-0618
dc.identifier.issn0950-0618-
dc.identifier.issn1879-0526-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.046
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/7593
dc.description.abstractIn this experimental study, the influence of thixotropy determined by different test methods on the formwork pressure of self-consolidating concrete (SCC) with varying compositions was investigated. In order to determine the effect of water/binder (w/b) ratio, slump flow diameter and coarse aggregate/total aggregate (CA/TA) ratio on thixotropy and formwork pressure of SCC, fifteen concrete mixtures were prepared. Four different test methods i.e., “structural break-down area” (SBDA), “break-down percentage” (BDP), “drop in apparent viscosity” (DAV) and “yield value at rest” (YVR) were performed to determine the thixotropy of the SCC mixtures. Test results showed that the SBDA, DAV and YVR methods were more appropriate to evaluate the thixotropy of SCC than the BDP method. A strong correlation between thixotropy and formwork pressure was found using SBDA, DAV and YVR methods in SCC mixtures having low w/b ratio. There was a strong relationship between thixotropy determined by SBDA, BDP and DAV methods and formwork pressure in low slump flow SCC mixtures, while thixotropy determined by the YVR method showed good correlation with the formwork pressure in SCC mixtures having high slump flow values. Finally, new models were developed to estimate the formwork pressure of all kinds of mixtures as a function of thixotropy and time. The models were found to be successful for each of the thixotropy measurement method.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTUBITAK (MAG 109M615)en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofConstruction and Building Materialsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectFormwork pressureen_US
dc.subjectSelf-consolidating concreteen_US
dc.subjectThixotropy methodsen_US
dc.subjectConcrete mixturesen_US
dc.subjectColloidsen_US
dc.titleInfluence of thixotropy determined by different test methods on formwork pressure of self-consolidating concreteen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-8527-5518en_US
dc.institutionauthorErdem, Tahir Kemal-
dc.departmentİzmir Institute of Technology. Civil Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.volume173en_US
dc.identifier.startpage189en_US
dc.identifier.endpage200en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000432645200020en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85045118985en_US
dc.relation.tubitakinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/TUBITAK/MAG/109M615
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.046-
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.046en_US
dc.coverage.doi10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.046en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
crisitem.author.dept03.03. Department of Civil Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Civil Engineering / İnşaat Mühendisliği
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0950061818308444-main.pdfMakale (Article)1.41 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

20
checked on Nov 15, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

18
checked on Nov 16, 2024

Page view(s)

280
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Download(s)

286
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.