Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11147/7117
Title: | Flood hydrograph prediction using machine learning methods | Authors: | Tayfur, Gökmen Singh, Vijay P. Moramarco, Tommaso Barbetta, Silvia |
Keywords: | Hydrograph predictions Machine learning methods Nonlinear Muskingum model Rating curve method St. Venant equations |
Publisher: | MDPI Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute | Source: | Tayfur, G., Singh, V. P., Moramarco, T., and Barbetta, S. (2018). Flood hydrograph prediction using machine learning methods. Water, 10(8). doi:10.3390/w10080968 | Abstract: | Machine learning (soft) methods have a wide range of applications in many disciplines, including hydrology. The first application of these methods in hydrology started in the 1990s and have since been extensively employed. Flood hydrograph prediction is important in hydrology and is generally done using linear or nonlinear Muskingum (NLM) methods or the numerical solutions of St. Venant (SV) flow equations or their simplified forms. However, soft computing methods are also utilized. This study discusses the application of the artificial neural network (ANN), the genetic algorithm (GA), the ant colony optimization (ACO), and the particle swarm optimization (PSO) methods for flood hydrograph predictions. Flow field data recorded on an equipped reach of Tiber River, central Italy, are used for training the ANN and to find the optimal values of the parameters of the rating curve method (RCM) by the GA, ACO, and PSO methods. Real hydrographs are satisfactorily predicted by the methods with an error in peak discharge and time to peak not exceeding, on average, 4% and 1%, respectively. In addition, the parameters of the Nonlinear Muskingum Model (NMM) are optimized by the same methods for flood routing in an artificial channel. Flood hydrographs generated by the NMM are compared against those obtained by the numerical solutions of the St. Venant equations. Results reveal that the machine learning models (ANN, GA, ACO, and PSO) are powerful tools and can be gainfully employed for flood hydrograph prediction. They use less and easily measurable data and have no significant parameter estimation problem. | URI: | http://doi.org/10.3390/w10080968 http://hdl.handle.net/11147/7117 |
ISSN: | 2073-4441 |
Appears in Collections: | Civil Engineering / İnşaat Mühendisliği Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
55
checked on Nov 15, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
49
checked on Nov 9, 2024
Page view(s)
332
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Download(s)
128
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.