Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11147/5519
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Göçeri, Evgin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ünlü, Mehmet Zübeyir | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dicle, Oğuz | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-16T08:35:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-16T08:35:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Göçeri, E., Ünlü, M. Z., and Dicle, O. (2015). A comparative performance evaluation of various approaches for liver segmentation from SPIR images. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 23(3), 741-768. doi:10.3906/elk-1304-36 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1300-0632 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1300-0632 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1303-6203 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1304-36 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11147/5519 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/168945 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Developing a robust method for liver segmentation from magnetic resonance images is a challenging task because of the similar intensity values between adjacent organs, the geometrically complex liver structure, and injection of contrast media. Most importantly, a high anatomical variability of a healthy or diseased liver is a major challenge in defining the exact boundaries of the liver. Several artifacts of pulsation, motion, and partial volume effects are also among the variety of factors that make automatic liver segmentation difficult. In this paper, we present an overview of liver segmentation methods in magnetic resonance images and show comparative results of seven different pseudo-3D liver segmentation approaches chosen from deterministic (K-means-based), probabilistic (Gaussian model-based), supervised neural network (multilayer perceptron-based), and deformable model-based (level set) segmentation methods. The results of quantitative and qualitative analyses using sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy metrics show that the multilayer perceptron-based approach and a level set-based approach, both of which use distance regularization terms and signed pressure force function, are the most successful methods for liver segmentation from spectral presaturation inversion recovery (SPIR) images. However, the multilayer perceptron-based segmentation method has a higher computational cost. The automatic method using the distance regularized level set evolution with signed pressure force function avoids the sensitivity of a user-defined initial contour for each slice, gives the most efficient results for liver segmentation after the preprocessing steps, and also requires less computational time. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Gaussian mixture model | en_US |
dc.subject | K-means | en_US |
dc.subject | Liver segmentation | en_US |
dc.subject | Magnetic resonance image | en_US |
dc.subject | Multilayer perceptron | en_US |
dc.subject | Image segmentation | en_US |
dc.title | A comparative performance evaluation of various approaches for liver segmentation from SPIR images | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.authorid | TR42462 | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Göçeri, Evgin | - |
dc.institutionauthor | Ünlü, Mehmet Zübeyir | - |
dc.department | İzmir Institute of Technology. Electrical and Electronics Engineering | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 23 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 741 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 768 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000352476800010 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84928652367 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3906/elk-1304-36 | - |
dc.relation.doi | 10.3906/elk-1304-36 | en_US |
dc.coverage.doi | 10.3906/elk-1304-36 | en_US |
dc.identifier.trdizinid | 168945 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 03.05. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering | - |
Appears in Collections: | Electrical - Electronic Engineering / Elektrik - Elektronik Mühendisliği Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
28
checked on Nov 15, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
25
checked on Oct 26, 2024
Page view(s)
4,054
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Download(s)
192
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.