Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/5093
Title: Variant concept of transportation-disadvantaged: Evidence from Aydın, Turkey, and Yamaga, Japan
Authors: Duvarcı, Yavuz
Yiğitcanlar, Tan
Alver, Yalçın
Mizokami, Shoshi
Keywords: Cluster analysis
Transportation-disadvantaged
Travel behavior
Travel demand models
Urban context
Aydın
Yamaga
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Source: Duvarcı, Y., Yiğitcanlar, T., Alver, Y., and Mizokami, S. (2011). Variant concept of transportation-disadvantaged: Evidence from Aydin, Turkey, and Yamaga, Japan. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 137(1), 82-90. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000044
Abstract: Transportation-disadvantaged groups have been defined in previous studies as those who are low income earners, are family dependent, have limited access to private motor vehicles and public transport services, and are obliged to spend relatively more time and money on their trips. Additionally the disabled, young, and elderly are commonly considered to be among the transportation-disadvantaged. Although generally this definition seems correct, it is not specific enough to become a universal definition that could apply to all urban contexts. This paper investigates whether perceptions of travel difficulty vary as does the definition of transportation-disadvantaged in socioculturally different urban contexts. For this investigation, the writers undertake a series of statistical analyses in a case study of Yamaga, Japan, and compare the findings with a previous case study, in which the same methodology, hypothesis, and assumptions were applied to a culturally and demographically different settlement in Aydin, Turkey. After comparing the findings observed in Aydin with the statistical analysis results in Yamaga, this paper reveals that there can be no detailed, universal definition of the transportation-disadvantaged. The writers conclude that the characteristics of the transportation-disadvantaged are not globally identical, and policies and solutions that work in one locality may not have the same results in another sociocultural context.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000044
http://hdl.handle.net/11147/5093
ISSN: 0733-9488
0733-9488
Appears in Collections:City and Regional Planning / Şehir ve Bölge Planlama
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
5093.pdfMakale168.65 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on May 21, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
checked on May 21, 2022

Page view(s)

202
checked on May 16, 2022

Download(s)

46
checked on May 16, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.