Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/4303
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDoğan, Sevgi Zeynepen_US
dc.contributor.authorTimurcan, Pelin İpek-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-20T11:07:46Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-20T11:07:46Z-
dc.date.issued2014-09-
dc.identifier.citationTimurcan, P. İ. (2014). A comparison of centrality measures for evaluating the project coordination performance. Unpublished master's thesis, İzmir Institute of Technology, İzmir, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11147/4303-
dc.descriptionThesis (Master)--İzmir Institute of Technology, Architecture, İzmir, 2014en_US
dc.descriptionFull text release delayed at author's request until 2017.10.13en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves: 97-103)en_US
dc.descriptionText in English; Abstract: Turkish and Englishen_US
dc.descriptionxv, 135 leavesen_US
dc.description.abstractEvaluation of coordination performance in a project network requires reliable measures and monitoring methods for effective management. Recent literature includes studies addressing the relationship between coordinative activity and the configuration of communication networks. In these works, the role of network centrality is investigated through the basic standard centrality measures of degree, betweenness and closeness. Current social network analysis research emphasizes new formulations of centrality measures for robust structural analysis of project networks. This study presents a novel approach for measuring network centrality using the concept of information centrality. It is based on the idea that all paths carry information. The significance of information centrality values for the actors in two major projects of Enron Corporation is investigated. There are three major findings from these analyses. First finding suggests that highly centralized actors show more coordination. Second finding suggests that information centrality is the most potent predictor for coordination in undirected networks. Third finding is that out-centrality measures are better predictors for coordination performance in directed networks. The implications of these findings have potentials for assessing the coordination performance in construction management research, and it is promising for the structural analysis of project communication networks.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIzmir Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCoordination performanceen_US
dc.subjectNetwork centralityen_US
dc.subjectCentrality measuresen_US
dc.titleA comparison of centrality measures for evaluating the project coordination performanceen_US
dc.title.alternativeProje koordinasyon başarımının değerlendirilmesi için merkezilik ölçümlerinin bir karşılaştırılmasıen_US
dc.typeMaster Thesisen_US
dc.institutionauthorTimurcan, Pelin İpek-
dc.departmentThesis (Master)--İzmir Institute of Technology, Architectureen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryTezen_US
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeMaster Thesis-
Appears in Collections:Master Degree / Yüksek Lisans Tezleri
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
T001335.pdfMasterThesis2.36 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

106
checked on Jun 10, 2024

Download(s)

78
checked on Jun 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.