Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11147/3928
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Yemenicioğlu, Ahmet | en |
dc.contributor.author | Aydemir, Levent Yurdaer | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-07-22T13:52:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-07-22T13:52:45Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11147/3928 | - |
dc.description | Thesis (Master)--İzmir Institute of Technology, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, İzmir, 2008 | en |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (leaves: 101-104) | en |
dc.description | Text in English; Abstract: Turkish and English | en |
dc.description | xiii, 104 leaves | en |
dc.description.abstract | Turkish chickpeas (4 cultivars) and lentils (6 cultivars) show similar total phenolic contents and free radical scavenging capacities in aqueous extracts ranging between 2869 and 4312 mg gallic acid equivalents/kg legume and 24.42 and 38.20 mmol Trolox equivalents/kg legume, respectively. However, the free radical scavenging capacity of lentil and chickpea protein extracts, range between 110 and 185 mmol Trolox/kg protein and 58 and 144 mmol Trolox/kg protein, respectively, clearly showed the higher free radical scavenging capacity of lentil proteins than chickpea proteins.Protein extracts of chickpeas and lentils showed considerable emulsifying and foaming capacities in almost at the same range, but emulsions and foams formed by chickpea proteins are more stable than those of lentil proteins. The lentil protein extracts are highly soluble and showed poor water absorption and gelling characteristics. In contrast, chickpea protein extracts showed moderate water absorption and gelling capacity.Chickpea protein extracts are also good oil absorbers with almost 1.5 to 2 fold better oil adsorption capacity than lentil protein extracts. Thus, chickpea proteins are suggested as soy and whey protein alternatives for functional proteins used in the food, drug and cosmetics industries. Considering functional properties of proteins for different cultivars, the outstanding Turkish chickpea cultivars are Gökçe and Cevdetbey, while the outstanding Turkish lentil cultivar is Alidayı. Variations in the functional properties of protein suggest the diversity of genes in chickpeas and lentils responsible for these properties. Thus, this study showed the possibility of improving functional properties of chickpeas and lentils by breeding programs. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Izmir Institute of Technology | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject.lcc | TP248.65.P76 A97 2008 | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Proteins | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Antioxidants | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Legumes--Biotechnology | en |
dc.title | Characterization of antioxdant activity and protein functionality in some legume cultivars grown in Turkey | en_US |
dc.type | Master Thesis | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Aydemir, Levent Yurdaer | - |
dc.department | Thesis (Master)--İzmir Institute of Technology, Bioengineering | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Tez | en_US |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.openairetype | Master Thesis | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
Appears in Collections: | Master Degree / Yüksek Lisans Tezleri |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
T000718.pdf | MasterThesis | 1.37 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
Page view(s)
162
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Download(s)
122
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.