Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/14198
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorÜnlü, H.-
dc.contributor.authorDemirörs, O.-
dc.contributor.authorGarousi, V.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-06T07:22:35Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-06T07:22:35Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn2047-7481-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2641-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/14198-
dc.description.abstractIndustry 4.0 changes traditional manufacturing relationships from isolated optimized cells to fully integrated data and product flows across borders with its technological pillars. However, the transition to Industry 4.0 is not a straightforward journey in which organizations need assistance. A well-known approach that can be utilized during the early phases of the transition is to assess the capability of the organization. Maturity models are frequently used to improve capability. In this systematic literature review (SLR), we analyzed 22 maturity and readiness models based on 10 criteria: year, type, focus, structure, research methodology followed during the design of models, base frameworks, tool support, community support, objectivity, and extent of usage in practice. Our SLR provides a well-defined comparison for organizations to choose and apply available models. This SLR showed that (1) there is no widely accepted maturity/readiness model for Industry 4.0, as well as no international standard; (2) only a few models have received positive feedback from the industry, whereas most do not provide any practical usage information; and (3) the objectivity of the assessment method is controversial in most of the models. We have also identified a number of issues as open research areas for assessing readiness and maturity models for Industry 4.0. © 2023 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Software: Evolution and Processen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCapability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)en_US
dc.subjectIndustry 4.0en_US
dc.subjectmaturityen_US
dc.subjectreadinessen_US
dc.subjectSoftware Process Improvement and Capability dEtermination (Spice)en_US
dc.subjectsystematic literature reviewen_US
dc.subjectSoftware designen_US
dc.subjectSPICEen_US
dc.subjectCapability determinationen_US
dc.subjectCapability maturity model integrationen_US
dc.subjectMaturityen_US
dc.subjectReadinessen_US
dc.subjectReadiness modelsen_US
dc.subjectSoftware process capabilityen_US
dc.subjectSoftware Process Improvementen_US
dc.subjectSoftware process improvement and capability determinationen_US
dc.subjectSystematic literature reviewen_US
dc.subjectIndustry 4.0en_US
dc.titleReadiness and maturity models for Industry 4.0: A systematic literature reviewen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dc.institutionauthor-
dc.departmentİzmir Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001126408700001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85179728076en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/smr.2641-
dc.authorscopusid57521977500-
dc.authorscopusid55949165100-
dc.authorscopusid13408954200-
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeReview-
crisitem.author.dept03.04. Department of Computer Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Nov 15, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on Nov 9, 2024

Page view(s)

90
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.