Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11147/4242
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorKaya Erol, Nursen-
dc.contributor.authorAtay Kaya, İlgi-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-05T09:43:43Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-05T09:43:43Z-
dc.date.issued2014-07-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11147/4242-
dc.descriptionThesis (Doctoral)--Izmir Institute of Technology, City and Regional Planning, Izmir, 2014en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves: 240-253)en_US
dc.descriptionText in English; Abstract: Turkish and Englishen_US
dc.descriptionFull text release delayed at author's request until 2017.08.11en_US
dc.description.abstractLand use planning is both a technical and a political process in which many different groups with multiple interests are affected by planning decisions. While every land use planning decision has a potential of creating conflicts, Locally Unwanted Land Uses (LULUs) are the most conflict facing subjects in urban land use planning because of their negative externalities such as health effects, economic costs and harms to environment. This thesis aims to find out the reasons of and solutions for the conflicts in the planning processes of LULUs. The thesis focuses on conflicts about three LULU types including solid waste facilities, fisheries and quarries in zmir, Turkey. Qualitative research design is used with techniques including document analyses, media search and in-depth interviews. In the case studies, the conflicts are analyzed with a proposed analysis method including issues for understanding and resolving conflicts. These issues are used to discuss characteristics and reasons of conflicts and existing and proposed conflict resolution methods. It is found that the reasons of conflicts are not only the negative effects of LULUs such as odor, pollution and noise but also procedural deficiencies such as lack of knowledge and lack of trust. The findings in case studies supported the theoretical works concerning limitations for the success of participatory processes seeking for consensus. Conflict resolution attempts including symbolic benefits rather than considering exact interests of local people should be rethought.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIzmir Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectLocally Unwanted Land Usesen_US
dc.subjectLand use planningen_US
dc.subjectPlanning processen_US
dc.subjectConflict resolutionen_US
dc.subjectSolid waste facilitiesen_US
dc.subjectFisheriesen_US
dc.subjectQuarriesen_US
dc.subjectIzmiren_US
dc.titleConflicts in the planning processes of Locally Unwanted Land Uses (LULUs): Case studies in Izmiren_US
dc.title.alternativeYerelde İstenmeyen Arazi Kullanımları (LULU) planlama süreçlerindeki çatışmalar: İzmir alan çalışmalarıen_US
dc.typeDoctoral Thesisen_US
dc.institutionauthorAtay Kaya, İlgi-
dc.departmentThesis (Doctoral)--İzmir Institute of Technology, City and Regional Planningen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryTezen_US
item.openairetypeDoctoral Thesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Phd Degree / Doktora
Sürdürülebilir Yeşil Kampüs Koleksiyonu / Sustainable Green Campus Collection
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10035428.pdfDoctoralThesis11.38 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

186
checked on Mar 25, 2024

Download(s)

296
checked on Mar 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.