Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorŞengel, Zehra Denizen
dc.contributor.authorEk, Fatma İpeken
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-22T13:51:32Z
dc.date.available2014-07-22T13:51:32Z
dc.date.issued2006en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11147/3439
dc.descriptionThesis (Master)--İzmir Institute of Technology, Architecture, İzmir, 2006en
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves:144-176)en
dc.descriptionText in English; Abstract: Turkish and Englishen
dc.descriptionxxi, 176 leavesen
dc.description.abstractIn the architectural, historical, and archaeological context of the eighteenth century, Italian architect Giovanni Battista Piranesi (1720-1778) played an important role. He posited crucial theses in the debates on the 'origins of architecture' and 'aesthetics'. He is numbered foremost among the founders of modern archaeology. But Piranesi was misinterpreted both in his day and posthumously. The vectors of approach yielding misinterpretation of Piranesi derived from two phenomena: one is the early nineteenth-century Romanticist reception of Piranesi.s character and work. The second is the mode of codification of architectural history. The former interpretation derived from Piranesi.s position on aesthetics, the latter from his argument concerning origins. Both of these served the identification of Piranesi as .unclassifiable.. He has thus been excluded from the 'story' of the progress of western architectural history.Piranesi, however, conceived of these two debates as one interrelated topic.Concerning origins, he developed a history of architecture not based on the East/West division, and supported this by the argument that Roman architecture depended on Etruscans which was rooted in Egypt. Secondly, he distinguished Roman from Grecian architecture identified with 'ingenious beauty'.Thus Piranesi placed Romans in another aesthetical category which the eighteenth century called 'the sublime'.Piranesi's perception caused him to be described as madman or idiosyncratic. However, most of these evaluations lack a stable historical base. Therefore, restoring Piranesi, his arguments, executed works and drawings to architectural history appear as a necessity.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherİzmir Institute of Technologyen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subject.lccNC257.P48 .E36 2006en
dc.subject.lcshPiranesi, Giambattista, 1720-1778en
dc.subject.lcshPiranesi, Giovanni Battista, 1720-1778 Contributions in architectureen
dc.subject.lcshPiranesi, Giovanni Battista, 1720-1778--Contributions in designen
dc.subject.lcshArchitecture, Modern--18th centuryen
dc.subject.lcshArchitecture--Romeen
dc.titleThe archaeological sublime: history and architecture in Piranesi's drawingsen
dc.typemasterThesisen
dc.contributor.authorIDTR130563
dc.contributor.departmentİzmir Institute of Technology. Architectureen
dc.relation.publicationcategoryTezen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record