Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUlu, Meltem
dc.contributor.authorArsan, Zeynep Durmus
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-12T18:47:26Z
dc.date.available2021-02-12T18:47:26Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2073-4433
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11070742
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11147/10180
dc.description.abstractEnergy-efficient retrofitting of historic housing stock requires methodical approach, in-depth analysis and case-specific regulatory system, yet only limited efforts have been realized. In large scale rehabilitation projects, it is essential to develop a retrofit strategy on how to decide energy-efficient solutions for buildings providing the most energy saving in a short time. This paper presents a pilot study conducted at a neighborhood scale, consisting of 22 pre-, early-republican and contemporary residential buildings in a historic urban fabric in the Mediterranean climate. This study aims to develop an integrated approach to describe case-specific solutions for larger scale historic urban fabric. It covers the building performance simulation (BPS) model and numerical analysis to determine the most related design parameters affecting annual energy consumption. All the case buildings were classified into three main groups to propose appropriate retrofit solutions in different impact categories. Retrofit solutions were gathered into two retrofit packages, Package 1 and 2, and separately, three individual operational solutions were determined, considering a five-levelled assessment criteria of EN 16883:2017 Standard. Energy classes of case buildings were calculated based on National Building Energy Regulations. Changes in building classes were evaluated considering pre- and post-retrofit status of the buildings. For the integrated approach, the most related design parameters on annual energy consumption were specified through Pearson correlation analysis. The approach indicated that three buildings, representing each building group, can initially be retrofitted. For all buildings, while maximum energy saving was provided by Package 2 with 48.57%, minimum energy saving was obtained from Package 1 with 19.8%.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3390/atmos11070742en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectenergy-efficient retrofiten_US
dc.subjecthistoric residential buildingsen_US
dc.subjectenergy consumption predictionen_US
dc.titleRetrofit Strategies for Energy Efficiency of Historic Urban Fabric in Mediterranean Climateen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalAtmosphereen_US
dc.contributor.departmentIzmir Isntitute of Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000572562200001
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record