Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPerumal, Muthiah
dc.contributor.authorTayfur, Gökmen
dc.contributor.authorRao, C. Madhusudana
dc.contributor.authorGürarslan, Gürhan
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-13T11:18:01Z
dc.date.available2017-11-13T11:18:01Z
dc.date.issued2017-07
dc.identifier.citationPerumal, M., Tayfur, G., Rao, C. M. and Gürarslan, G. (2017). Reply to comment on “Evaluation of a physically based quasi-linear and a conceptually based nonlinear Muskingum methods” by Reza Barati. Journal of Hydrology, 550, 740-742. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.005en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-1694
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.005
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11147/6450
dc.description.abstractThe writers thank the discusser for his interest in the study of Perumal et al. (2017) and welcome the opportunity to address the issues raised by the discusser. The discusser has mainly raised four issues on the comparative study carried out by Perumal et al. (2017) in evaluating the performances of the VPMM model and the NLM based models, which was initiated by Gill (1977, 1978). These four issues are addressed by these writers in the following pages: As a first issue, the discusser has raised a question about the appropriateness of using the VPMM model (Perumal and Price, 2013), which he considers as the much improved routing model of the Muskingum-Cunge family approach, and the original nonlinear Muskingum model of Gill (1978), which he, perhaps, considers as a initial version of the NLM models. These writers perceive that the discusser intends to convey that the performance evaluation study presented by Perumal et al. (2017) based on a latest improved model and a initial version of the NLM models is inappropriate. Before discussing straightaway on this issue, the writer would like to clarify on the misconception of the discusser in categorizing the VPMM method and the Muskingum-Cunge method under one family approach.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.005en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence methodsen_US
dc.subjectConceptual designen_US
dc.subjectFlood routingen_US
dc.subjectOpen channelen_US
dc.subjectMuskingum methoden_US
dc.titleReply to comment on “Evaluation of a physically based quasi-linear and a conceptually based nonlinear Muskingum methods” by Reza Baratien_US
dc.typeannotationen_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR2054en_US
dc.contributor.iztechauthorTayfur, Gökmen
dc.relation.journalJournal of Hydrologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentİYTE, Mühendislik Fakültesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume550en_US
dc.identifier.startpage740en_US
dc.identifier.endpage742en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000404816000057
dc.identifier.scopusSCOPUS:2-s2.0-85020001808
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record